NHRC warns Odisha authorities of “coercive action” over non-compliance

Cuttack: The National Human Rights Commission has expressed strong displeasure over the failure of key Odisha officials to comply with its earlier directions, warning of possible “coercive action” if pending reports are not submitted within two weeks.

The Commission noted that several authorities—including the Chief Secretary of Odisha, the Transport Department’s Principal Secretary, the District Collector-cum-Magistrate of Cuttack, and the Commissioner of the Cuttack Municipal Corporation—have not filed the required action taken reports. It cautioned that it may invoke powers under the Protection of Human Rights Act 1993 if the delay continues.

Complaint over lack of basic amenities

The case stems from a petition filed by local residents alleging denial of basic civic amenities to nearly 50,000 people in Ward No. 56. Despite being part of the municipal corporation since 1997, the area reportedly continues to suffer from severe infrastructure gaps.

Residents also raised safety concerns over a dilapidated bridge on the Kuakhai River, alleging that heavy vehicles are allowed to use it during restricted hours, putting lives at risk.

Partial response, continued gaps

Earlier, on March 11, 2026, the Commission had sought detailed reports from multiple departments within four weeks.

In a partial reply, the state’s Human Rights Protection Cell (HRPC) informed the NHRC that the issue largely falls under the municipal corporation’s jurisdiction. It added that:

• The civic body has been asked to address residents’ grievances
• Traffic authorities have been directed to regulate heavy vehicle movement
• Police deployment has been initiated to enforce restrictions

However, the NHRC found the response inadequate and noted continued silence from other departments.

Fresh deadline issued

On April 22, the Commission directed all concerned authorities to submit complete reports within two weeks. It also asked the HRPC to file an updated status report within the same timeframe.

“Serious human rights concern”

In its earlier order, the NHRC had observed that it was “surprising” that a ward under the municipal corporation for decades still lacks basic amenities. It warned that allowing heavy vehicles on an unsafe bridge could amount to a serious violation of fundamental rights.

The Commission emphasised that the issues raised directly relate to the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution.