At the end of the 42nd week, global bunker indices MABUX continued their downward trajectory, defying expectations of an upward correction. The 380 HSFO index declined by USD 12.11, from USD 450.92/MT to USD 438.81/MT, slipping below the USD 450 threshold. The VLSFO index dropped by another USD 12.55, reaching USD 508.81/MT compared to USD 521.36/MT a week earlier, approaching the USD 500 level. The MGO index also decreased by USD 13.86, moving from USD 774.32/MT to USD 760.46/MT. At the time of writing, a moderate downward trend persisted across the global bunker market.

The MABUX Global Scrubber Spread (SS) — the price difference between 380 HSFO and VLSFO — posted a slight decline of $0.44, moving from $70.44 last week to $70.00. The indicator remains well below the psychological breakeven level of $100.00. The weekly average of the index also decreased by $2.68. In Rotterdam, the SS Spread continued its downward movement, losing $10.00 to settle at $25.00 compared to $35.00 a week earlier, reaching a low of $23.00 at one point — the first time since October 30, 2024. The weekly average in the port fell by $10.00. In Singapore, the 380 HSFO/VLSFO price spread narrowed by $11.00, from $80.00 to $69.00, while the weekly average slipped by $1.50. Overall, SS Spread indicators declined steadily throughout the week, further widening the gap from the $100.00 psychological mark and reinforcing the cost advantage of using conventional VLSFO over the HSFO + scrubber option. This downward trend is expected to persist.

Forecasts indicate that demand for liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a marine fuel could at least double by 2030, driven by stricter emissions standards and a growing fleet of LNG-capable vessels. Large-scale export projects in the US and Qatar are expected to result in an LNG oversupply by the end of the decade, putting downward pressure on prices and enhancing its cost competitiveness relative to traditional, higher-emission bunker fuels.

European regional gas storage facilities were 83.09% full, reflecting a 0.54% increase. This level is 11.76% higher than at the beginning of the year (71.33%), although the pace of injections remains relatively modest. By the end of the 42nd week, the European TTF gas benchmark continued its downward trend, declining by €1.445/MWh to €31.801/MWh, compared to €33.246/MWh.

The price of LNG as a bunker fuel at the port of Sines (Portugal) continued its downward trend this week, falling by USD 36.00 to USD 732/MT, compared to USD 768/MT the previous week. The price differential between LNG and conventional fuel also narrowed, reaching just USD 10 in favor of conventional fuel—down from USD 32 a week earlier. On the same day, MGO LS was quoted at USD 722/MT at the port of Sines.

At the end of the 42nd week, the MABUX Market Differential Index (MDI)—the ratio of market bunker prices (MBP) to the MABUX digital bunker benchmark (DBP)—reflected the following price dynamics across the world’s largest hubs: Rotterdam, Singapore, Fujairah, and Houston:

The overall balance between overvalued and undervalued ports continued to tilt toward overvaluation. Currently, two ports are overvalued in both the 380 HSFO and MGO LS segments, and one port is overvalued in the VLSFO segment. This trend suggests a gradual structural shift in the MDI balance toward overvaluation, which is expected to persist in the coming week.

The climate NGO Transport & Environment (T&E) asserts that global biofuel production emits 16% more CO₂ than the fossil fuels it is meant to replace. The organization projects that by 2030, biofuel-related emissions will surpass those of fossil fuels by 70 million tonnes of CO₂-equivalent. T&E also emphasizes the land-use inefficiency of biofuels: the 32 million hectares currently devoted to growing biofuel crops could instead feed 1.3 billion people. Alternatively, converting just 3% of this land to solar farms would generate an equivalent amount of energy, highlighting the relative effectiveness of renewable energy solutions. According to T&E, biofuels represent an ineffective climate strategy and an unjustifiable use of land, food resources, and public subsidies. Burning agricultural crops for fuel, they argue, not only fails to deliver meaningful emission reductions but also exacerbates food security and land-use conflicts. T&E therefore calls on governments to prioritize renewable energy sources such as solar and wind power over crop-based biofuels.

We believe that the moderate decline in bunker indices is set to continue, with the downward trend expected to extend.

 

Source: By MABUX